Week 2 (7/3): Trauma-Informed Practice and Clinical Foundations
Section outline
-
-
Opened: Monday, June 9, 2025, 12:00 AMDue: Thursday, July 3, 2025, 11:59 PM
This short paper (3-4 pages) invites you to reflect on how your personal identities, experiences, and social location shape the way you think about substance use, recovery, and your emerging clinical stance. You'll bring an honest, thoughtful lens to questions like: What assumptions do I carry? What values shape my responses? What personal experiences feel close to this material, and how do they influence how I show up in the room?
You're not expected to share anything you don't feel safe or comfortable disclosing. This is not about self-disclosure for its own sake, nor is it about the specific content of your experiences, but rather about understanding yourself as a clinician: where your biases live, where your passion lies, and where you have room to grow.
You'll be expected to cite at least 2-3 readings or sources that have helped you contextualize or deepen your reflections. This assignment bridges the personal and the scholarly, bringing your internal world into conversation with theories, frameworks, and perspectives we're studying. Think of it as a rehearsal for ethical, self-aware practice.
In plain language, I'm looking for:
1) Thoughtful reflection on how your experiences and identities shape your views
2) Clear connection to course concepts
3) Honest insight into your growth areas and clinical stance
4) Writing that's organized and readable
5) Respect for your own boundaries. Share what feels right for you.Criteria Excellent (5) Good (3-4) Needs Improvement (1-2) Self-Awareness & Insight Demonstrates deep reflection, honesty, and complexity in exploring values, biases, and emotional responses Shows effort to reflect, with some depth; some areas underexplored Limited self-reflection or over-generalized; lacks depth or nuance Connection to Scholarship Skillfully integrates 2-3 course readings, theories, concepts, or scholarly sources to conceptualize reflection Includes readings/concept, though integration may be surface-level or unclear in places Few or no references; little connection to theoretical frameworks Clarity & Organization Writing is clear, coherent, and easy to follow; strong voice and flow Mostly clear; minor issues with structure or tone Disorganized or unclear; difficult to follow thoughts or structure Ethical Boundaries & Containment Shares appropriately; reflects awareness of clinical self Attempts to reflect awareness of clinical self Unclear reflection of clinical self Citation & Formatting Proper APA style used for citations and references (minor errors okay) APA mostly correct; small issues in formatting Missing or incorrect citations; APA not followed