HART 610 Surveying Byzantium
Section outline
-
For this week's session, please make an appointment with Professor Walker to discuss your interests in the course and/or the connection of the course to your exams/thesis proposal. Please submit a reading response providing at least 2-3 articles or book chapters you read following up on your conversation with Professor Walker.
-
Due: Tuesday, September 15, 2026, 11:59 AM
-
-
-
Due: Tuesday, September 15, 2026, 11:59 AM
Due to Moodle by midnight Wed 9/9
-
Background reading:
-
This multimedia introduction to Hagia Sophia provides a good overview of the monument and a basic timeline for its history. Spend some time with the videos and photos, which are high quality, dynamic, and will help you make sense of some of the readings that have primarily black and white images.
-
Discussion reading:
-
This brief survey of Byzantine architecture relates Hagia Sophia to a broader Byzantine tradition of sacred art.
25.2 MB · Uploaded 09/9/26, 22:14 -
This essay considers the “afterlife” of Hagia Sophia in the Ottoman era. You may find this reading a bit more dense (it was written for more of a scholarly audience), so do your best with it.
7.1 MB · Uploaded 09/9/26, 22:14 -
This close analysis of a synagogue in Cleveland offers alternative ways to think about canon formation and its impacts.
10.3 MB · Uploaded 09/9/26, 22:14 -
Optional:
-
Further reading:
-
Please read pp. 1-4. The rest can be perused if you wish but is not essential.
333.3 KB · Uploaded 09/8/26, 13:36
-
-
Periodization, Geography, and the Borders of Art History
-
Due: Wednesday, September 22, 2027, 11:59 PM
First read the selections from the two editions of Janson, taking notes about how you would compare and contrast the overall aims and premise of each edition.
How is Byzantium characterized in the master narrative that each textbook constructs? How do those master narratives change from the 1964 edition to the 2007 edition?
What works of art are chosen to constitute a Byzantine canon? What place does the textbook give Byzantine art/architecture in the larger art historical canon?
For analyzing the place of Byzantine art/architecture in the textbook's broader narrative, make use of the table of contents, chapter headings and subtitles, and introduction (all scanned and included on Moodle) to develop a sense of the motivations and values undergirding the selection and organization of the themes and content of the book.
Review your notes in response to the questions above. Choose a single topic or idea (or a closely related set of topics/ideas) to develop in your response paper.
Cite at least one specific image from each of the Janson editions to support or focus your analysis. You can refer to the figure number and vol. of Janson for each image or snap a photo of the specific images and mount them with your response paper. I will upload the images you all have emphasized into a PowerPoint and bring them to class to guide our discussion.
AFTER HAVING WRITTEN YOUR RESPONSE PAPER, read the short articles in the "conceptual reading section." Then reread your essay and write a brief paragraph at the end commenting on whether/how the conceptual readings prompt you to think differently about your analysis of the two editions of Janson.
The required reading response and discussion question is due to Moodle by Midnight Wednesday, September 16.
-
153.6 MB · Uploaded 09/8/26, 13:36
-
This reading gives a brief overview to a scholarly intervention critiquing "the" survey text in art history. In the 1990s, there was a massive backlash against the survey, which was critiqued for being Eurocentric, elitist, and intellectually reductive. Many institutions, including Bryn Mawr, eliminated the traditional survey couse at this time. I will tell you more about that moment in the history of art history pedagogy when we meet.
-
This and the next essay by Nelson discussion the how Byzantium fits into surveys of art history and other canon forming tools and practices of the discipline. The two articles employ a broad range of useful frames and terminology which you might find useful in refining impressions you wrote about in your analysis the two editions of Janson -- although please write your initial response to Janson BEFORE reading these essays. I think you will get more out of them if you first grapple with how to compare the two editions of Janson.
-
This brief manifesto by an undergraduate art history major reflects on the ethics of art history and possibilities for demanding accountability in how we practice the discipline. Please reflect on whether you share perspectives with the author, if you disagree with her vision, or if you would adapt it in specific ways. Please also consider whether these kinds of values should/could be incorporated into a revisionist survey of art history -- and if so, what that would look like.
-