September 21 (No Class)/ Make-up Class September 23: The Arabesque
Section outline
-
-
Opened: Tuesday, September 1, 2026, 12:00 AMDue: Sunday, September 20, 2026, 5:00 PM
What associations with the idea of “ornament” did you start the readings with?
What do we learn about the place of ornament in histories of art from this cluster of texts? What were some arguments or claims that surprised or intrigued you?
How might you characterize the conversation that is occurring between these readings? Many of the authors for this week are historians of Islamic art – how do they characterize the position of ornament in discussions of Islamic art history? How might the authors’ positions and the dates of their publications, contexts of production, and intended audiences have shaped these various accounts of ornament?
-
This is a dense reading - try to trace and highlight the author's comments about the scholars and readings that we are doing for this week (Riegl, Ettinghausen, and Herzfeld) and also read carefully the analysis of Owen Jones's The Grammar of Ornament. Do not worry about the taking note of each scholarly work that is discussed; rather, try to trace the broader argument about how scholarship on the "arabesque" has developed and changed over time.
-
708.4 KB · Uploaded 08/27/26, 14:57
-
Focus in particular on the motivation for this argument (p. 234) and on the description of the "infinite rapport" (pp. 272-281).
-
5.7 MB · Uploaded 08/28/26, 11:22
-
Further reading
-